From the Company's defence put forward by gary hather plant hire you will see from reading the original statements would not stand up in court based on the following..

1 You can't give evidence to something you claimed to have happen in your own statement then go on to say i didn't actually witness anything this applies to all three in the gary hather plant hire defence read above links to there statements.

1

A Company employer has a duty of care to protect his employee's from serious injury by providing a safe system of work in this instance you will see that he seriously failed to do this and protect me from serious injury and this can be established by reading under the section of j.c.b evidence.

3

You will see from reading there defence on the above links that gary hather appears to declare himself to be the safety director and officer of his own company and dosn't make it clear who these people are or that he directly employed two qualified people to take up those positions to which i am very surprised about as i was never informed about this when i started working for the company or did he provide me with me a copy of his company health and safety policy at work i only became aware of this when i was sent a copy through the solictors in 1993.Based on my own opinion is that these people didn't exist at the time i was employed by gary hather and as i was never interviewed regarding the accident on the january 17th 1990 and neither is there a company report relating to my accident on file which was never provided to me through the lawyer's.

4

Also the lawyer's did not make any investigation to see if he was qualified to be a safety director,officer of his own company or that he did directly employed two qualified people to take up those positions and in my honest belief and opinion there was no actual legal policy draughted up that ever existed as you can see its only typed up on a company headed letter and there is no policy number or any kind of reference that could actually make it a legal document so in effect it would not form any basis of any evidence that could be used in a court of law and quiet possibley could of been typed up the very day before it was posted this is based on my opinion.

5

My honest opinion about gary hather is that based on my own experiences working for him he didn't have any regard or concerns about health and safety in his own company by providing a safe system of work to protect his employees from serious injury which also could of prevented my serious accident .Also my other opinion gary hather is quiet capable of paying off my legal team in the professional negligence claim to stitch me up and get himself out of trouble to which i admit i cannot prove it ever took place or ever happened but it wouldn't not surprise me at all and not running a very reputable company to a industry standard that would be expected from him as this is the type of man i believe he is soley based again on my own opinion

6

So based on the defence put forward by the company on the links at the top of the page its rather difficult to imagine why the defendants in this present action come up with the advice they did mentioned in the link civil action gary hather plant hire claim at the doors of the court on december 12th 1996 and that my case was a extremely difficult case to pursue and that apply's to all the lawyer's and barristers who was involved with my case from the beginning and right up to the end of december 12th 1996.