This alleged incident took place on the 28th november 1998 i can assure you that i was not going excessive speed as the police claimed in there statements they always like to make things to appear worse than what they really are.On arrival at the police station at bridge st sheffield i was not searched or my car keys taken from or from the roadside when i was stopped,i was requested by the police officer known to me as p.c..hodgson 1433 to do a test on the intoximeter the first test took place around 1.39.am and the second reading was 1.41.am.the reading was 42 micrograms was then requested by p.c s.d hodgson 1433 to do finger prints and photo's he then went on to say to me after they were completed that i could do the re-lease test on the intoximeter and if the reading was ok i was free to go home this reading took place of approximate time of 1.55 am and the reading suddenly dropped down to 36 less than 15 minutes after the reading of 42 was taken.As i didn't know or understand the police procedure i was never given the option of a blood or urine test as i now know i was entitled to that option instead of giving a second reading at 1.41 am. I was then taken to the custody desk i was then charged for the alleged offence of drinking and driving at 2.04 am.They went on to say to me that you are free to go home.the police officers p.c. hodgson 1433 and p.c.smith 3471 gave me a lift back to my car in wood seats Sheffield and drove home As you can see from the police witness statements i was bailed at 2.04 am

I then went to see several solicitor's to represent me at magistrates court in sheffield to no success,the case was adjourned in january and february 1999 and finally was heard in march 1999.I did manage to get a solicitor in sheffield to represent me i showed him my charge sheet and unsigned bail sheet and he basically just said i was guilty before anything had been looked into, so on his negligent advice i ended up pleading guilty as i didn't know what the hell to do or even have a chance to defend myself,he charged me £150. for about 20 minutes or less at court.The magistrate didn't order any fine just £40. costs and a 3 year ban.

I then decided to appeal against the sentence and conviction this took place at sheffield crown court i instructed a firm of solicitors taylor's based in wood seats sheffield,the acting solicitor requested the printout for the release test that the police claimed took place at 2.28 am on the morning of 28th november 1998 i knew they could not produce it as i was not there at that time i was on my way home.The first hearing was on the 16th july 1999 the police turned up on that day with some dodgy looking evidence they claimed was a intoximeter print out of the release test which was just some photo copy on a piece of paper not a actual print out i told the barrister who was acting for me that i had never seen it before he and the acting solicitor decided not to look into it Further.The case was adjourned for expert witness evidence i then knew i was been stitched up by the police and my acting solicitor and barrister and felt in a totally helpless situation, so in effect the police was misleading the courts and expert witness ,the next hearing date was set down for september 10th 1999 my legal team decided to drop my appeal against the conviction and appeal against sentence instead on medical grounds been a amputee i did not want to drop my appeal against the conviction this put me in a hopeless situation and coarse of action i did not want to take.My appeal was dismissed at a later date on medical grounds based on the fact i had less blood in my body due to having a leg amputated as this would effect the readings as to a person with two legs this was evidence that was provided by medical expert in this field.

At the end of year 2000 i decided to recover the case papers from the solicitors who represented me the appeal and do my own investigation into the case as i know there was something seriously wrong with the conviction and sentence at this point i wasn't sure what it was.On reading the police file there is a large bundle of papers which is record of charge as you can see from the document form m.g 20 submitted as indicated there is no evidence to indicate the a police custody record ever existed . From section b the document form m.g mm . under B5 statutory option this is when i discovered the police had forged my signature this was the first time i had ever seen this document as i have stated previously that i was not given this option on the 28th november 1998.I then decided to write to the chief constable of south yorkshire police to make a official complaint,i then had a chief inspector white house come to visit me around february -march 2001 i showed him this document and his response was cocky and arrogant as at the same time he went on to produce a photo copy bail sheet with my signature on and i was rather shocked at this as my original i was given at the police station is not signed by me or the custody sergeant i then went on to ask him about the original custody record and court bail sheet and to my astonishment i discovered they didn't exist either i told him they had forged my signature on the bail sheet and he totally denied this,he then went on to say if that wasn't my signature on the bail sheet he had produced then we are talking of compensation so in effect it was just the file copy they had forged . I was furious about this and said to him that the police had stitched me up just to get a driving conviction and the fact i had been suffering with my disability and been deprived of a quality life as i was so dependant on a car for mobility reasons.As he left his further response was as previous cocky and arrogant and just denied they had stitched me up..Due to the failure of chief in specter whitehouse in not having my legitimate complaint recorded and registered with the p.s.d police standards department this prevented my case been investigated further and by the p.c.a formerly known at the time as the police complaints authority for fraud..

I found out about the criminal cases review commission based in birmingham so i decided to contact them to pursue the matter further and the end result in december 2001 was that they just covered the case up for the police and c.p.s. The solicitor who represented me for commission application stated to me that there was insufficient evidence by the police to get a conviction and the case go to court and that they tried to make a case against me 8 months later when i made an appeal against the conviction at the magistrates court which was not lawfully obtained in march 1999 . In january 2002 i then instructed the solicitor who was representing me on my professional negligence claim claim to apply for legal aid to pursue the case further this was refused based on the idea it had been investigated by the above .I was not going to give up and later on in the year i spoke to a hand writing expert and explained the case to him and that the above commission didn't have the forged signature analyzed he informed me that there should be a original bail sheet to actually produce a photo copy,i then knew at this point the police could not produce it as it didn't exist . i then instructed my acting solicitor on both cases to write to the police to request the original . so you can guess correctly the police had forged my signature again .I received a envelope from my solicitor and to my astonishment there was the police official custody record along with a bail sheet document no 6 with my forged signature on they claim is the original and as you can see it does not match the photo copy . document no 7 and also you can see the custody record is not filled in at the front to state who was held in custody or signed by anyone just false entries in the back after 2.04 am.I have heard that the police can lace the intoximetors with alcohol so it effects the reading when some one blows into the machine im not sure that this is entirely true or not but considering what they have done with my case i wouldn't put it passed them to pull any dirty trick to get a conviction against anyone they can and are fully aware of there actions what they are doing and are committing a very serious criminal offence but at the end of the day they don't give dam a what they do to people as they are so dam arrogant and corrupt think they are untouchable just like lawyers as they know there is always some one to kiss there arrogant arses to cover up for them departments etc.I then decide to take the matter further and instructed a new lawyer at a firm of solicitors in darnel sheffield south yorkshire around april -may 2003 on presenting the new fresh evidence then stated to me he couldn't quiet believe what the police had done so then re-applied for legal aid funding to obtain a barristers advice he was based at the same chambers as my other acting barrister who was representing me on the professional negligence claim.

When i had my review on my professional negligence claim at the legal services commission offices in leeds i produced this fresh new evidence to the five lawyers in support of my application for funding to take action against the police for a malicious prosecution and wrongful arrest and charge and to my surprise funding was refused for the case.I then decide to take the matter further and instructed a new lawyer at a firm of solicitors in darnel sheffield south yorkshire around april-may 2003 on presenting the new freshevidence then stated to me he couldn't quiet believe what the police had done so then re-applied for legal aid funding to obtain a barristers advice he was based at the same chambers as my other acting barrister who was representing me on the professional negligence claim.